Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02

Eisenhower Media Network

Logo_EMN_dark-02

Eisenhower Media Network

  • About EMN
  • Experts
  • Media
    • Media & Appearances
    • Press Releases
      • The U.S. Should Be a Force for Peace in the World
      • Military and Foreign Policy Experts on America’s Diplomatic Malpractice
  • Reports
  • Contact An Expert
  • Donate
Recent Posts
  • VIPS MEMO: What Wider War in Venezuela Would Bring
  • Americans Must Halt the March to War on Venezuela
  • Michael Baker: Retired generals warn of dire consequences of Trump politicizing military

“The success of the now extended truce and prisoner exchange between Israel and Hamas shows that diplomacy works where military force does not. Despite the protestations of the US and Israeli governments, Israel and Hamas conducted the truce and prisoner exchanges under terms and circumstances that were available in the days immediately following the attack on October 7. 

As has been widely reported, ceasefire and prisoner exchange opportunities were rejected by the Israeli government, while the US government refused to utilize its enormous leverage over Israel to induce Israeli acceptance of a ceasefire and prisoner swap. The result has been tens of thousands of Palestinian casualties, hundreds of Israeli military casualties, a thorough destruction of Gazan homes and infrastructure, increased regional instability and a collapse of progressive political support for President Biden’s re-election campaign. 

For the sake of the people of Israel and Palestine, as well as regional stability and global peace, Israel and Hamas should further extend their truce. Negotiations should be expanded to include not just increased prisoner exchanges and a permanent ceasefire, but securing civil and human rights for all Israelis and Palestinians, an end to Israel’s occupation and the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state. 

US foreign policy circles are full of commentators who argued against a ceasefire and prisoner exchange because, they claimed, Hamas could not be trusted. These are the same sorts of voices, massively over-represented in US media and political spaces, who were proven incorrect when they argued the US could not negotiate with the North Vietnamese, the Soviet Union, the Iraqi insurgency, the Taliban and other adversaries. They have once again been proven wrong. 

The commentators who dismiss diplomacy and constantly and predictably argue for more war and weapons, most of whom are funded by the arms industry, should be ignored. At the same time, those promoting peace through dialogue, negotiations and reconciliation need to be acknowledged and heeded, as they are the ones who have been proven correct repeatedly. “

Previous PostAssociate Director Matthew Hoh's Statement on Israel-Hamas Truce Deal
Next PostLaich & Wilkerson: America’s Armed Forces Need a Lottery-Based Draft for Men and Women

Latest Posts

Avalon, Victoria, Australia - March 4, 2013: United States Air F

VIPS MEMO: What Wider War in Venezuela Would Bring

VIPS MEMO: What Wider War in Venezuela Would Bring Russia, and possibly even China, would feel obligat

Press Releases
November 11, 2025
Avalon, Victoria, Australia - March 4, 2013: United States Air F

Americans Must Halt the March to War on Venezuela

Americans Must Halt the March to War on Venezuela The Trump administration appears to be spoiling for

Press Releases
October 31, 2025

Eisenhower Media Network Announces New “Profiles In Cowardice” Award

Eisenhower Media Network has launched the Profiles in Cowardice Award, asking the public to “vote for

Press Releases
July 14, 2025
© 2025 Eisenhower Media Network. All Rights Reserved