Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02
Logo_EMN_dark-02

Eisenhower Media Network

Logo_EMN_dark-02

Eisenhower Media Network

  • About EMN
  • Experts
  • Media
  • Reports
  • Reels
  • Contact An Expert
Recent Posts
  • William Astore: The Last Good Guys?
  • Lawrence Wilkerson, Dennis Laich, & Erik Edstrom: Climate action, as patriotism
  • William Astore: Higher Military Spending Leads to Less Security

Imagine you’re President Joe Biden. You need $2 trillion dollars to fund one of your stated priorities – infrastructure. You learn of a war plane, the F-35 Lightning II, that would cost as much as $1.7 trillion to buy, field and maintain over the next 50 years. It’s $200 billion over budget, and more than ten years behind schedule. What do you do? 

“Your first thought,” replies retired air force lieutenant colonel William Astore, “would probably be to cancel it, save more than a trillion dollars, and fund America’s infrastructure needs. Yet instead, the U.S. military is turning on the afterburners and going into full production. What gives?”

The F-35 program has weathered an endless string of complications: engines that are unreliable, an ultra expensive software program riddled with bugs, operating costs as much as 300% higher than those of the F-16 and the A-10. The list goes on. And so too goes the F-35. Why? 

The answer, says Astore, is simple: the power of the military industrial complex. The F-35’s lead contractor, defense corporation Lockheed Martin, uses its well-oiled lobbying machine to insulate the program from political pressure. Lockheed Martin takes care to create jobs in 45 states and 307 congressional districts. In essence, writes Astore, “the F-35 program has become ‘too big to fail.’ At the Pentagon level, the plane is supposed to fulfill the needs of the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps for a “fifth generation” stealthy fighter. There is no alternative, or so you’re told.”

But there are alternatives. And in this case, ending the F-35 program is an appealing one. It would save billions of dollars, and signal to defense contractors that there are no rewards for failing to deliver on time and under budget. 

No weapons system should be too big to fail. So, asks Astore, “Why continue that scandal? Why not end that tragedy? You can decide to send the strongest and clearest message to the military-industrial-congressional complex by cancelling the F-35. You can vow to reform the flawed system that produced it. And you can fund your vital infrastructure programs with the savings.” 

Read the full article here. 

The Pentagon tells you it’s the F-35 or bust. But for you as president, it’s the F-35 and bust.

William Astore

Previous PostI lost both my legs fighting in Afghanistan. Staying there doesn't honor our troops
Next PostMatthew Hoh: Biden’s Progressive Path through Afghanistan

Latest Posts

News-item_Astore-1

William Astore: The Last Good Guys?

Here’s what I wonder: Why in this century has America, the “leader of the free world” (as we used to s

Astore, TomDispatch
May 12, 2022
News-item_Astore-1

William Astore: Higher Military Spending Leads to Less Security

Personal security is in many ways related to national security. Certainly, a nation as large as the U.

Astore, Bracing Views
April 13, 2022
News-item_Astore-1

William Astore: What Would It Take for Military Spending in America to Go Down?

So, what would it take for the Pentagon budget to shrink? Blowing the whistle on wasteful and underper

Astore, TomDispatch
April 6, 2022
Recent
William Astore: The Last Good Guys?
Astore, TomDispatch
May 12, 2022
Lawrence Wilkerson, Dennis Laich, & Erik Edstrom: Climate action, as patriotism
Edstrom, Laich, Wilkerson
April 25, 2022
William Astore: Higher Military Spending Leads to Less Security
Astore, Bracing Views
April 13, 2022
Twitter Feed
Missing Consumer Key - Check Settings
Tags
9/11 (2) Afghanistan war (6) Afghanistan withdrawal (18) automated warfare (2) boycott (2) China (6) climate change (2) Cold War (3) Congress (3) Dan Berschinski (3) Danny Sjursen (13) defense budget (11) Dennis Laich (3) department of defense (4) drones (2) Eisenhower (4) empire (2) Erik Edstrom (5) featured (18) forever wars (7) Gregory Daddis (3) Iran (2) Lawrence Wilkerson (7) Matthew Hoh (9) military (8) military industrial complex (14) military spending (3) NDAA (4) news (82) Pentagon (12) podcast (4) President Biden (3) refugees (4) Russia (8) suicide (2) Taliban (2) truthteller (2) Ukraine (7) United States (19) veterans (15) veterans day (3) war (2) War Profiteering (2) whistleblower (3) William Astore (23)
© 2021 Eisenhower Media Network. All Rights Reserved